Aurora (
auroracloud) wrote2019-03-24 11:29 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
People, tag your fandoms right.
A regular pet peeve: why do people write New Who fic with only New Who characters etc. tagged on AO3, with no sign in the summary or the tags that there are in fact any Classic Who elements present, and then tag it both with Doctor Who (2005) and Doctor Who (1963) (ie. Classic Who)?
There's a reason those fandom tags are separate on the archive. If it's truly a crossover fic for both the new and classic series, by all means tag it with both. But trust me, when I'm looking in the Classic Who fandom tag, it's not because I want to read Ten/Rose or Twelve/Clara. It's really, really NOT.
It's pretty ridiculous that Ten/Rose is actually in the top ten relationship tags for Classic Who. Some of them might be legitimately there, for some crossover reasons, but based on the samples I've seen when I'm just trying to find new Classic Who content, the majority is most likely not.
I know I can filter tags to exclude things I don't want, but I shouldn't have to start my browsing by filtering out stuff that belong in the fandom tag in the first place.
Maybe I'll soon start leaving peeved comments in those fics, except that a) I don't want to increase their hit and comment count, and b) the sort of people who tag in the wrong fandoms probably aren't people I want to get into an argument with. So I'll just continue fuming on my own.
This is where I like the way Teaspoon is organized by era. People don't tend to stick random Twelve/Clara into the Second Doctor or Fifth Doctor categories unless it's really and truly a crossover.
There's a reason those fandom tags are separate on the archive. If it's truly a crossover fic for both the new and classic series, by all means tag it with both. But trust me, when I'm looking in the Classic Who fandom tag, it's not because I want to read Ten/Rose or Twelve/Clara. It's really, really NOT.
It's pretty ridiculous that Ten/Rose is actually in the top ten relationship tags for Classic Who. Some of them might be legitimately there, for some crossover reasons, but based on the samples I've seen when I'm just trying to find new Classic Who content, the majority is most likely not.
I know I can filter tags to exclude things I don't want, but I shouldn't have to start my browsing by filtering out stuff that belong in the fandom tag in the first place.
Maybe I'll soon start leaving peeved comments in those fics, except that a) I don't want to increase their hit and comment count, and b) the sort of people who tag in the wrong fandoms probably aren't people I want to get into an argument with. So I'll just continue fuming on my own.
This is where I like the way Teaspoon is organized by era. People don't tend to stick random Twelve/Clara into the Second Doctor or Fifth Doctor categories unless it's really and truly a crossover.
no subject
Still, it's so confusing when people tag the fandoms wrong - because Classic Who is such a smaller fandom that when a non-negligible percentage of the Ten/Rose and Twelve/Clara writers tag their works in the Classic Who fandom, it clutters the fandom a lot and makes it so much harder to find any of the stuff I'm looking for. Of course I can filter, but it's frustrating when I first have to filter out the stuff that doesn't belong there in the first place. Maybe at some point I will make it my mission to point this out politely and nicely to people...
Yay, I'm glad I've been using the fandom tags correctly! It seemed the most logical like that. I've noticed that they do automatically end up under the meta-tag above, since often in exchanges some people will use the "Doctor Who" tag so it shows up in the fandoms as well, but also contains works that have only been tagged under the 2005 or 1963 tags.
no subject
But I can see why users who are only used to tumblr might get confused and not know that it works very differently elsewhere - so many social media sites do operate on hashtags and with very little moderation (like on Teaspoon) or the wranglers on AO3.
since often in exchanges some people will use the "Doctor Who" tag so it shows up in the fandoms as well, but also contains works that have only been tagged under the 2005 or 1963 tags.
Yes, it's quite handy when people do that in exchanges! You can just click on the one tag to see all the goodies.
But, yes, this is the tag structure for Doctor Who, which is why it works like that (you're just gradually filtering down with each sub-tag, barring people who Don't Know How To Tag (a popular tag on AO3 with many variants, lol), via the tag landing page. (I do love tag landing pages!)
ETA: How Do I Tag aka a cry for help from many confused users of AO3. :-D
no subject
ETA: How Do I Tag aka a cry for help from many confused users of AO3. :-D
Haha, that's a lot of confusion and consternation! :-D To be fair, I also find it hard to choose the right additional tags to describe my fics beyond the fandom, characters and relationships. Thinking up enticing and accurate tags is hard! But I try to be careful about the more clear-cut tag categories, like is this actually in this fandom.
no subject
There was once, for reasons, a "The Avengers - Ambiguous Fandom" tag. People used it, even though it was basically tagging your work "help I don't know whether this is an American Movie/comic book thing or British cult spy thing featuring Emma Peel goddess". (It's been tidied up now, but that is people and tagging for you.)
no subject
People! People always ruin things!
a "The Avengers - Ambiguous Fandom" tag
Oh dear, that is precious!